What This Example Shows

A material comparison is useful when the same model can be printed in either PLA or PETG and the customer only needs a durability upgrade. The weight stays fixed so the comparison isolates spool price instead of mixing in print time or labor.

The $0.72 material difference is not the whole pricing decision. PETG may print slower, need more tuning, have a higher failure risk, or require different finishing, so move to the full cost calculator before quoting a finished job.

Inputs

PLA spool$22 per 1000 g
PETG spool$28 per 1000 g
Print weight120 g

Outputs

PLA material cost$2.64
PETG material cost$3.36
Difference$0.72

Formula Explanation

PLA = 22 / 1000 × 120. PETG = 28 / 1000 × 120. Difference = PETG - PLA.

Use This Example When

  • You need to show the material-only cost difference between two manually entered spool prices.
  • You are checking whether a stronger material meaningfully changes the quote floor.
  • You want to keep material comparison separate from labor, machine, and failure assumptions.

Before You Use the Number

  • Use the same print weight only when the slicer estimate is the same or close enough for the comparison.
  • PETG tuning, print speed, and failure risk are excluded here and should be added separately when relevant.

Assumptions

  • Both materials use the same print weight.
  • Print time, failure rate, and tuning differences are excluded.

FAQ

Does this example use live prices?

No. The example uses fixed sample inputs. Replace them with your own rates.

Can I run the calculator with my own values?

Yes. Open the 3D Printer Filament Cost Calculator and enter your own assumptions.